ABD’deki Michigan Üniversitesi mezuniyet töreninde Filistin ile dayanışma eylemi yapıldı

A lawyer appointed for Gordon Black, a U.S. Army soldier arrested in Russia, has appealed his detention, according to the state-owned TASS news service.

Social media has made it easier to build more parasocial relationships with celebrities and influencers. What impact are those connections having on our relationships IRL? And how do they shift our understanding and expectations of intimacy and trust?Florida State University assistant professor Arienne Ferchaud defines parasocial relationships and discusses how new technologies are changing the role of entertainment in our lives.Listen and subscribe here: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | YouTube | Google Podcasts | Pocket CastsThe following transcript has been edited for clarity:Megan Garber: Andrea, growing up, did you have an imaginary friend?Andrea Valdez: I did. Yeah, I had an imaginary friend whose name I cannot believe I’m gonna tell you. Sorry. I cannot believe—sorry. His name was Barfy.Garber: Ah! Yes![Music.]Valdez: I definitely have questioned if this imaginary-friend thing really happened—with a name like Barfy, it feels like it could be a total false memory that someone planted in my head to mess with me. But when it’s come up over the years in conversation with my mom, she said she thinks maybe I was trying to say Barbie.Garber: Do you have any memory of how he came to be? Or what he looked like?Valdez: No, I don’t remember any of that. I just think I was too young to form any real coherent memories about him. My brother is six years older than me, and so I kind of wonder if I made up a friend because I was lonely when he went off to elementary school. And so Barfy wasn’t “real” but was real company, and I think I needed that type of connection for some real reason.Garber: Yes, definitely. RIP, Barfy.[Music.]Valdez: I’m Andrea Valdez. I’m an editor at The Atlantic.Garber: And I’m Megan Garber, a staff writer at The Atlantic.Valdez: This is How to Know What’s Real.[Music.]Valdez: Megan, I know you’ve been writing about technology and culture for a long time at The Atlantic, but I feel like in these last few years, you’ve really been focused on thinking about truth and fiction.Garber: Uh-huh;yeah.Valdez: I mean, you wrote an article last year called “We’re Already Living in the Metaverse.”Garber: [Laughter.] Welcome.Valdez: Tell me more about what you mean by living in the metaverse.Garber: Yeah. So I’m thinking of the metaverse in part this long-standing dream in the tech world—this hope that, when computers get advanced enough, they can create environments where virtual reality seems less virtual and more reality. And, of course, the tech hasn’t quite caught up to that big vision, but the idea of the metaverse is what we are navigating right now—this idea that one day we’ll be able to immerse ourselves in our entertainment. That’s the world that’s here. It’s just that the immersion isn’t strictly a matter of a single place or platform. Instead, it’s everywhere.[Music.]Valdez: That line between reality and fantasy feels really blurry right now.Garber: Yes.Valdez: There’s the really obviously insidious stuff—like, there’s the rise of deepfakes and AI-generated scams. But there are these slightly murkier areas. Like, are content creators on YouTube and social media showing us their authentic selves, or is it really just a performance?Garber: Yes. And in some ways those are age-old questions, right? People have been thinking about the difference between the performed life and real life, such as it is, for centuries—and millennia, even! But exactly then, like you said, the difference feels hazier now than it’s ever been. And so much of that has to do with technology. I think about the line “All the world’s a stage,” and that used to be a metaphor. But it’s becoming ever more literal.[Music.]Garber: Imaginary friends seem so childlike and so kind of fanciful and fantastical, but it does occur to me that we have versions of them even as adults, right?Valdez: Totally.Garber: I’m thinking about, for example, the people on my social media who I follow—and I know in some ways very intimate details about their lives. I know what’s in their medicine cabinets, what they have for breakfast. And of course they know nothing about me. They don’t know even that I exist. Do you have people in your life, Andrea, that you feel connected to in that way?Valdez: Yeah; I mean, of course. There’s like, a lot of folks that are listening. I listen to several podcasts, and I feel really close to the hosts of those podcasts. And it makes me just feel like I really know them. And like, there’s, like, a couple of running influencers that I follow on Instagram, and one of them just finished the Boston Marathon, and I was so proud of her. [Laughter.] And it’s just really strange to say that, even, because she’s a total stranger.Garber: [Laughter.]Valdez: I mean, I guess I can be proud of this relative stranger—but, like, I just knew so much about her ambition and her goals. So yeah; it’s totally weird. And like, with the podcasters—I mean, they’re in my ears every week, so I feel like I have this sort of standing date with them.Garber: Mmm. Yes. And I think a key thing with all those relationships is that the “friends” you’re describing are real and imaginary at the same time.Valdez: Huh.Garber: So they’re relationships, definitely, and they’re giving you a lot of what IRL friendships can. But also the “relation” aspect is so different from what it would be IRL.[Music.]And I wonder: What are those relationships we’re building with these people we don’t really know?Arienne Ferchaud: A parasocial relationship is essentially this sort of simulated relationship.Garber: So, Andrea, I talked with Dr. Arienne Ferchaud. She is an assistant professor of communications at Florida State University, and she’s been studying emerging media and especially the feelings of closeness that so many of us get just by watching strangers on a screen—even with something as commonplace as watching the news.Ferchaud: The news anchor is talking to the screen like they’re talking to you. It sort of simulates a back-and-forth, because they are looking right at you. They might use words like our community, lots of we and us and inclusive language like that. So it simulates kind of a social interaction, but it’s not. It’s actually one-sided.Garber: Dr. Ferchaud, when did your interest in parasocial relationships really begin?Ferchaud: Through a series of kind of weird and unfortunate—not unfortunate, really fortunate—events, I wound up having an on-campus job. And at first I wanted something really easy, that I wouldn’t have to, like, do a lot, but all those were taken. [Laughter.] So I wound up as an undergraduate assistant to a professor there by the name of Dr. Meghan Sanders. And we worked on this study related to this character on the TV show House. The character kind of abruptly committed suicide on the show and was gone off the show. This is not a real person. The actor, of course, is fine. But people were really mourning that character.Garber: Huh.Ferchaud: He was played by Kal Penn.Garber: Oh, that’s right; I remember that.Ferchaud: He left to go work for Obama, and so they killed him off the show. [Laughter.] People actually set up these Facebook pages that were memorial pages. It was virtually indistinguishable from, like, a memorial page you would set up for a friend. Like: “Oh, I’m gonna miss you so much.” Talking directly to the person. But it’s that same sort of idea when that character that we are really fond of is kind of taken away. People really do kind of react like they are just another person that they know.Garber: I’ve certainly felt that, and—for me as a viewer—it’s a little bit hard to process that feeling. I question the validity, because I know this is fiction. This is fake. Why do I care so much? But, it is a loss!Ferchaud: It goes back to sort of evolutionary biology and psychology. Essentially, evolution happens over millions of years, right? It takes a long time. But when we think about the history of television, that hasn’t been around that long in the grand scheme of things. I mean, my parents were, like, there when television started. So you kind of have this situation where, consciously, yes: We know this is not real. This character might be dead, but the actor’s fine. But our lizard brains, in a way, don’t really know the difference.Garber: So do our minds—I mean, like, how do they distinguish even between the sort of factual person and the fictional person? Or is the point that they simply don’t?Ferchaud: Yeah; on some level, they don’t. Based on what I know about parasocial relationships, I think it’s a matter of closeness to some degree. You know, when my father passed away I was—and still am, you know, a couple years later—very grief-stricken about that, right? You feel that loss very intimately all the time, every day, because that person is part of your life all the time, every day. Whereas with media characters, they’re not really a part of your whole life in the same way. We know them in that very specific context, and so that would indicate a lesser degree of closeness. You certainly feel the loss at that time, but you kind of get over it much quicker.Garber: Yeah; that makes sense. It’s almost like the mechanisms of television, which are very, you know, episodic and very kind of in the moment. But then you turn off the TV and go on with your life.[Music.]Valdez: I don’t know, Megan, but is that still the world we live in? Where you just turn off your TV and you can reenter reality?Garber: Yeah; it is complicated. I use the phrase “IRL”—so “in real life”—all the time to talk about in-person interactions. And really to talk about the physical world as a general environment. But also the idea of “real life” as a distinctly physical thing can be a little misleading. Because some stuff on the web, just as we’ve been talking about, is real. The people we interact with on it, the topics we might be learning about or debating, are often real. So the screens are part of our realities. And really importantly, they mediate real relationships.Valdez: Yeah; I mean, I justify a lot of my screen time by a version of what you just said—that these are real, meaningful relationships, and they’re relationships that I need to be spending time with.Garber: For many of us, the screens are unavoidable. I’m looking down at my littlewatch right now. They’re just around these screens. Which makes me think about Marshall McLuhan, who did so much to shape the way people talk about media today. He talked about screens, and really media in general—whether they help us to see each other, or hear each other, or just know each other—how those mediums become “extensions of man.” And I think what we’re seeing right now is what it really means to have our devices in a very direct and often literal way be extensions of us.Valdez: And we’re not really even just experiencing screens more as a part of our lives; we’re bringing more parts of our lives into our screens.Garber: Yes. It’s no longer just fictional stories or, you know, the straight-ahead news from the streets. Instead, we’re just witnessing other people’s lives as they choose to share them. We’re invited to their living rooms, into their kitchens, medicine cabinets. [Laughter.] And it’s just creating all these new ways of seeing each other—whether in a literal sense or just in a broader way of awareness and connection to other people’s lives.Valdez: We’re physically looking at other people so much more than we ever probably have. There’s a study by this psychologist named Gayle Stever that discusses how we’re hardwired to become connected to faces and voices: things that are familiar to us. And her findings suggest that parasocial connections, like we’re talking about, might just be natural extensions of this evolutionary instinct that exists in us. So, if we’re constantly being presented with people on our screens, maybe there’s something just simply innate in us that leads us to form these attachments.[Music.]Garber: Dr. Ferchaud, you’ve studied what people connect with when they watch other people on screen, and I’d love to know what your research found. Is it authenticity that we’re seeking?Ferchaud: I would say it’s primarily the perception of authenticity. In which case, how authentic it actually is doesn’t matter, really.Garber: Oh, interesting.Ferchaud: I do have a study where we looked at YouTubers and parasocial attributes—like, what they were doing in their videos to sort of cultivate a parasocial relationship. And so if we think about, for example, a YouTuber: A lot of those people start off—if we go back to like 2005, 2006, when YouTube was really just starting—those people are starting off in their bedrooms with, like, a janky camera. And it gives this idea like, Okay, I’m just a regular person. You’re just a regular person. We’re all just regular people together. [Laughter.] That industry has changed quite a bit.Garber: Yep.Ferchaud: YouTubers are professionals now. And so authenticity is still that perception like, Oh, this is just a regular person like me. Because if you’re an influencer, your whole career is based on your ability to create parasocial relationships. Right?Garber: Yeah.Ferchaud: So, what we found is that it was a lot of self-disclosure, and we were pretty broad with that. So it didn’t have to be, like, a deep, dark. It could be something very small. And what we found there was: It didn’t really matter the type of self-disclosure. So it could be positive things: “I had a good day. I did some fun stuff with my friends.” You know, it could be neutral things: “I woke up late today.” It could be negative things. It didn’t really matter. It still built those feelings of authenticity. That maps social relationships. Generally speaking, if you’ve got a friend, you know some positive things, some negative things, some neutral things about them.Garber: I wonder, too, about the lines, then, between sort of the parasocial relationship of today and the celebrity. You know, the “celebrity” is such an old idea, and I think many viewers and many audiences felt some kind of ownership over celebrities—at least their images, their, you know, PR realities. All that kind of stuff. So what are some of the differences between the modern parasocial relationship and the long-standing celebrity relationship?Ferchaud: So if we think about it, we go back to the golden age of cinema. If you look into it, it’s really wild what the movie studios of the time, how much control they had over stars’ lives.Garber: Yes.Ferchaud: And they would do things like arrange marriages. So they had this crazy control; so the images were very, very curated. Now, there’s just so much more access—and part of it, you know, when you think about an influencer, they are inviting people into their lives in a certain way. And there is that feeling of This is authentic, this is real—in a way that, you know, 1920s Hollywood doesn’t feel, because it was so carefully constructed. And I think that that authenticity kind of builds these parasocial relationships in a way that is interesting and unique. This idea of celebrity—that is also a parasocial relationship, but it is a little bit different. Because unlike our traditional understanding of influencers, a celebrity is sort of on a pedestal. Like, it’s hard to imagine Beyoncé shopping at Publix. [Laughter.] I don’t know. That would kind of break your brain a little bit.Garber: It really would, yes.Ferchaud: In a way, that’s not true with influencers, because of that sort of perception of authenticity a little bit more.Garber: That totally makes sense. And it makes me wonder, too, if parasocial relationships and influencers, as they are having more influence over everything, if that will change our ideas about celebrity, too. I mean: Maybe the celebrities of the future—even the Beyoncé levels of celebrity in the future—you know, will be shopping at Publix. And will actually make a point of showing us that they shop at Publix, you know, to perform authenticity in that way.Ferchaud: Well, I mean, I remember when Leo Messi moved to play at Inter Miami, somebody posted a video of him at Publix, and everybody was like, “Oh my gosh, how cool. He’s at Publix, you know, one of the most famous people in the world. And they shop at Publix.” I think people actually really respond to stuff like, “This is a real person. He shops at Publix.” Social media has changed the amount of access we get with celebrities.[Music.]Valdez: Megan, there’s sort of this inversion happening in which, maybe, influencers who gained followers by being quote-unquote “authentic” and letting you into their lives are now curating their lives more similarly to how the studios and the actors have traditionally done. And celebrities—who have historically been very curated and manicured—are showing us parts of their lives that are more authentic.Garber: Yes, definitely. I think that’s such a good point. And I also wonder whether the inversion you’re describing is also just a matter of technological logistics—just a function, basically, of the way we now interact with each other through screens. This is something else that Marshall McLuhan talked about. You know, we may think about technology as gadgets that we build and use and, most importantly, that we control. But he said that tech also controls us.Valdez: Oh yeah.Garber: Yeah. Like, technology basically has an ideology baked into it in some way, where, you know, each new piece of technology—whether it’s a newspaper or a radio or a TV or a smartphone—has assumptions basically baked into it about how the human should interact with it.Valdez: Yes.Garber: And when we interact with those devices over time, that kind of conditions us to live according to those assumptions: according to the way that the technology, you know, guides us to live. So print mediums encourage us to think in ways that are basically, you know, printy—linear, logical. Valdez: Right.Garber: And screen mediums are much more visceral and immediate.Valdez: Yeah. And what about AI? Where is that going to fit into all of this? Right now there is just a lot of discussion around how AI is learning about us through large-language models, but how is it going to impact the way we think and how we look for connection?Garber: Yes, yes, yes.Valdez: We’re in this moment where it’s actually becoming quite hard for people to be able to discern instantly if something is even AI or not.Garber: Yeah. Yup.Valdez: So what do we call that relationship?Garber: Mmm. I asked Dr. Ferchaud about that. I wanted to know, especially, if the relationships that people are building with AI could still be considered parasocial. Or if—as the bots learn how to imitate human connection—we should think differently about our relationships with AI.[Music.]Ferchaud: It is parasocial insomuch as that it’s one-sided, which is part of the definition of what parasocial is. But because the illusion of it being two-sided is so much deeper than, like, you’re watching somebody on TV, right?Garber: Yeah. Yeah.Ferchaud: So if we think about, like, a chatbot talking to you and you talking to it—it certainly seems more social in one sense, because you’re talking and getting a response. But generally speaking, they don’t have memory in the same way that humans do. And they don’t build relationships the same way humans do. As of right now, I’m sure, you know, I’m not—[Laughter.]—an AI person who’s designing and developing AI. And so they might listen to this and be like, “Just you wait.”Garber: [Laughter.] Yeah, that’s right. There’s a bot that’s remembering you right now.Ferchaud: I’m gonna train my bot right now.Garber: Promise I’m not a bot.[Laughter.][Music.]Valdez: AI definitely feels like another evolution of the technology and the tools that we’ve seen. And, just like with those other tools, and with those other technologies and that other evolution, it’s really a bit incumbent on us—as people who are using those tools and technologies—to make sure that we’re not forming any sort of, you know, bad relationship to it. Like, we’ve got to check ourselves. Just like, you know: Anybody could have a potentially bad relationship in a parasocial relationship where they take it too far. With AI, we’re going to have to do the same thing.Garber: Oh, I love that comparison. You know, we learn in adulthood to build boundaries in those relationships to protect ourselves, often, and to manage our vulnerabilities. Yeah, and our intimacies. And protect other people, too.Valdez: Right.Garber: And maybe we are in the kind of preteen phase of figuring out the relationship that we have with AI.Valdez: Mmm. The preteen phase, the most fun phase to go through. [Laughter.]Garber: And maybe the hardest, too; yeah.Valdez: Interestingly, it’s also a phase where we are shifting our relationships to be more personal in nature. Researchers have found that this is the time you’re sharing more intimate thoughts with people outside your families. You’re letting people into your inner life. So actually, maybe describing this time with our devices as a sort of adolescence is really appropriate.Garber: Yeah. And adolescence is also so, like, future-oriented, right? So much of that phase of life isn’t just about the relationships you’re forging, but about looking ahead and sort of figuring out how you want to be, who you want to become. And I think that’s useful, here, too—thinking about what kind of digital adulthood we want to create together, and especially what types of relationships we want to be building with each other.Valdez: I actually think it’s really important that we’re not too quick to demonize this behavior. Like, what’s clear to me is that parasocial relationships are actually fine and normal to have. I mean, for some people, yes, there is a small risk of these relationships turning dysfunctional. But largely, parasocial relationships fulfill some sort of need we have in our lives.Garber: Yes, and a really profound need too, I think. I’ve been thinking:We tend to talk about social media and bots and the web in general as things that are totally new and, you know, unprecedented. And therefore so hard to figure out. But the machines are really just new tools for doing this very ancient thing: which, like you said, is connecting with each other. Humans are social animals. And we’ll find ways to be social, whether it’s on a Zoom call, in person, or on a podcast.Valdez: Well, it’s been really nice connecting with you, Megan.Garber: Nice connecting with you too, Andrea![Music.]Garber: That’s all for this episode of How to Know What’s Real. This episode was hosted by Andrea Valdez and me, Megan Garber. Our producer is Natalie Brennan. Our editors are Claudine Ebeid and Jocelyn Frank. Fact-check by Ena Alvarado. Our engineer is Rob Smierciak. Rob also composed some of the music for this show. The executive producer of audio is Claudine Ebeid, and the managing editor of audio is Andrea Valdez.[Music.]Valdez: Next time on How to Know What’s Real:danah boyd: When we go online, you know, there’s joy in interacting with the people we know. But there’s also pleasure to, you know, what I think of as that, you know, the digital street, right? The ability to just see other people living their lives in ways that you’re just like, Wow, that’s different, and I’m intrigued. Garber: What we can learn from urbanization about how to live in a crowded, bustling digital world.We’ll be back with you on Monday.

Rhode Island clear-broth clam chowder is a local culinary tradition that traces its roots to Native Americans who prepared seafood stew before the arrival of cows and creams.

The vast coin collection of a Danish butter magnate is finally set to go on sale a century after his death and could fetch up to $72 million, its auction house says.

Residents in Long Beach, California successfully got a ban on Airbnb rentals in their neighborhood after filing a petition to the city council last month.

Sen. Pete Ricketts, R-NE, said President Biden was 'absolutely mismanaging' Israel's war with Hamas after he threatened to withhold high payload bombs from America's ally.

Cohen’s testimony will be the culmination of 20 tumultuous years.

The American Culture Quiz from Fox News Digital tests readers' knowledge of unique national traits, trends, people and popular interests. Try this newest one featuring a baseball great and more.

The phrase, "separation of church and state," appears nowhere in the Constitution and the Founding Fathers saw nothing wrong with having religion in American culture, according to an expert.

Michael Cohen, who for nearly a decade was Donald Trump's trusted adviser and personal attorney, is scheduled to take the stand Monday in Trump's hush money trial.

The "Glee" alum, 37, took to social media Sunday to mark the holiday by revealing the gender of her and husband Zandy Reich's second child. 

Elon Musk has argued that he is standing up for freedom of speech, while Australian lawmakers have accused him of lacking a sense of social responsibility.

Michael Cohen's credibility issues and social media usage have captured media attention heading into his potentially bombshell testimony against Donald Trump.

Rain enters the forecast Tuesday and stays in the forecast into the weekend.

Florida's Lee County sheriff has a message for Democrats fleeing criminal mayhem and lawlessness in New York and California.

A decision to end an extended-year program at Roscoe Nix Elementary School has frustrated some teachers who say they relied on the summertime salary.

Michael Cohen is expected to take the stand this week in Donald Trump’s hush money criminal trial. Meanwhile, he is live wearing cowboy hat filters, receiving calls from Rosie O’Donnell and sharing his feelings on TikTok.

Some legal experts are surprised that the trial judge allowed the adult-film actress to testify about an alleged unwanted sexual event in a case centered on allegations of falsifying business records.

Photo Illustration by Thomas Levinson/The Daily Beast/GettyFor a moment it seemed Rep. Mike Collins (R-GA) knew that, this time, he’d taken it too far.Last week, the prolific shitposter lauded a group of fraternity brothers at Ole Miss who jeered a Black pro-Palestine protester—including one who made racist monkey noises at the woman—as “Ole Miss taking care of business.”The mainstream media and left-leaning politicians’ response to Collins’ statement was swift and scathing. The archconservative freshman lawmaker is no stranger to controversy—in recent months he’s dubbed Haiti a “sh*thole” country and suggested an undocumented migrant be thrown from a helicopter—but this time, even Collins acknowledged his post amplifying naked racism warranted some damage control.Read more at The Daily Beast.

John TaggartDonald Trump’s ongoing hush money trial is the pinnacle of American spectacle, a lurid phantasmagoria of shifty lawyers and adult failsons (Hi, Eric!) tweeting their way through the embarrassment of public scrutiny.Any hard-nosed political reporter would kill for a regular spot in the courtroom, and visual artist Isabelle Brourman is one of the lucky few. The New York native works in several mediums, but her current focus is courtroom sketches, which she’s producing at a breakneck clip for New York magazine while covering the trial.Courtroom sketching is a centuries-old art, and its practitioners in the New York City media scene are mostly old-guard traditionalists. At 30, Brourman’s age sets her apart from her peers, but it’s her sketches that are the truly extraordinary draw. Rather than capturing one person at a time, Brourman’s watercolor and colored-pencil figures overlap and bleed into one another like atoms clustered within the same organism. There’s abstraction at play here, but journalistic diarism too.Read more at The Daily Beast.

NetflixThe 2015 hacking of adulterous dating website Ashley Madison was a crime, and yet precious few felt sorry for those who were impacted by this offense, be they the company’s CEO and his employees or the 37 million users who were outed as cheaters. Ashley Madison: Sex, Lies & Scandal, a three-part Netflix docuseries from directors Zoe Hutton and Gagan Rehill, focuses on a couple of sob stories—including a popular Christian vlogging couple caught in the cheating crossfire—which detail the fallout from this headline-making incident, all in an effort to put a human face on a tawdry scandal. No matter the tears and critiques dispensed by those individuals, however, there’s little here to lose sleep over—unless, of course, your profile was in one of the two infamous data dumps.Arriving a year after Hulu and ABC News’ The Ashley Madison Affair, Netflix’s Ashley Madison: Sex, Lies & Scandal (May 15) is a standard-issue recap of this saga, told through the eyes of a handful of insiders, journalists, and families that were devastated by the release of their confidential information. It begins with Evan Back, Ashley Madison’s former VP of sales, who joined the company in 2007 thanks to his childhood friend Noel Biderman, who had recently been hired as the start-up’s CEO after original founder Darren Morgenstern couldn’t find a way to make the business catch fire. Darren’s brother Marc participates in these proceedings, discussing the early difficulty of selling a site that was all about infidelity. He confesses that Biderman was Ashley Madison’s agent of transformative change, ushering in an era of immense growth thanks to his out-front promotion of the brand on any and every talk show that would book him.Given Ashley Madison’s salaciousness, Biderman quickly became a TV fixture, raising the company’s profile and helping it make money hand over fist. It wasn’t long before expansion took the site around the globe, complete with nation-specific advertising campaigns that cheekily pushed the promise of covert extramarital satisfaction. In archival interview clips (since he didn’t agree to participate in this series), Biderman touts the beneficial aspects of Ashley Madison, claiming that it actually saved marriages by letting people explore their unfulfilled dreams without destroying the unions they loved and relied upon as the bedrock foundations of their lives. Suffice it to say, those arguments don’t sound any more convincing now than they did then; Biderman comes across as a sleazy huckster pretending to be an upstanding gentleman—an image he cultivated with the assistance of wife Amanda, who joined him on television and posed for billboard advertisements, asserting all along that they were in a monogamous relationship.Read more at The Daily Beast.

Spencer Platt/Getty ImagesIn January 2015, Islamic terrorists murdered 12 people at the French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo for depicting the Prophet Muhammad. When PEN America honored the magazine with its Freedom of Expression Courage Award that same year, the organization received backlash from prominent members.Then-PEN president Andrew Solomon stood by the decision, saying that the controversy was a reminder that the “defense of people murdered for their exercise of free speech is at the heart of what PEN stands for, so is the unfettered articulation of opposing viewpoints.”Standing up for free speech principles against religious extremism, it turns out, was the right call since it remains a real threat to authors and speakers around the world. At a book talk in August 2022, novelist and former PEN America president Salman Rushdie was stabbed 15 times by an assailant who admired Iran’s theocratic regime that issued a fatwa against Rushdie back in 1989 for the supposed blasphemy of his novel The Satanic Verses.\Read more at The Daily Beast.

Severe thunderstorms are forecast to cause flash floods in Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Iowa, Alabama and Florida on Monday.

Workers at the first Apple Store to unionize, outside Baltimore, have now also authorized a first strike against the tech giant's retail operations.

Former federal prosecutor Joyce Vance discusses the complications around Michael Cohen's testimony in Trump's hush-money case.

It was never a dull moment. I met all the Trump family, and I remember one incident with Don Jr.

Barron, Tiffany, Donald Junior and Eric Trump, along with Kimberly Guilfoyle and Michael Boulos were Trump family members selected to the Florida RNC delegation.

Newsweek has provided detailed instructions, hints, and answers for today's "Connections" brainteaser.

Clarence Williams/DisneyWhen Wired’s Jason Parham published “A People’s History of Black Twitter” in July 2021, it felt monumental. Here was an attempt to comprehensively recount one of the largest, most impactful online communities in history—a daunting task way beyond what most internet culture explainers ever approach. Its scope was so impressive that the feature was split into two parts.“This story of Black Twitter is as important as the story of Facebook, as the story of all these other tech platforms,” Parham told The Daily Beast’s Obsessed in an interview at SXSW earlier this year, of the inspiration behind his feature. “Our story is valuable.”But there was only so much that Parham could include. After all, Black Twitter is something that defies simple definition: It’s “a comedy showcase, therapy session, and family cookout all in one,” as Parham wrote in his piece. Black Twitter is the simplest way to refer to the space carved out by Black social media users, who have used the tools of the internet—memes, hashtags, trending topics—to develop a language, sense of community, and social influence.Read more at The Daily Beast.

More than a dozen students at Princeton University said they were ending their hunger strike amid continued anti-Israel demonstrations at the university.

Israel's military has ordered the evacuation of more neighborhoods in Rafah ahead of a potential major ground operation in the southern Gaza city, where over 1 million Palestinians are estimated to be displaced.

Anti-Israel agitators from North Carolina to California have disrupted commencement ceremonies following weeks of demonstrations that upended campus life.

Much of "2054" by Elliot Ackerman and Ret. Admiral James G. Stavridis focused on the race to achieve the singularity, which would accelerate tech development to unbelievable levels.

The upcoming presidential election is likely to become a fraught topic of conversation in the workplace as November 5 approaches.

Finding today's "Wordle" puzzle a challenge? Newsweek has put together a few hints to help you out.

The rockers kicked off their hotly-anticipated "Dark Matter" tour earlier this month, but their May 4 gig wasn't without its drama.

Dear Abby weighs in on a man who took it too far with his situationship and a caregiver who has reached her limits.

El gobierno federal repartió alrededor de 5 billones de dólares en asistencia por la pandemia entre 2020 y 2021 —una cantidad mucho mayor a la de contrapartes extranjeras—, lo que dejó a muchas familias en mucho mejor forma financiera e impulsó el gasto del consumidor hasta bien entrado el 2023.

Russia lost 1,740 troops in a single day, marking the highest daily casualties since the start of the war more than two years ago, Ukraine's military said.

Tras décadas de turbulencia, esta organización de gran tradición ha introducido cambios radicales, desde permitir por fin la participación de jóvenes homosexuales hasta acoger a niñas en sus filas.

Blinken also directly addressed the U.S. withholding high payload bombs to Israel.

“Es un tonto. No es un hombre inteligente”, dijo Trump sobre Biden. “Ahora hablo de él de manera diferente porque ya me quité los guantes”.

Prosecutors are asking a judge to impose a 40-year prison sentence for the man who broke into ex-U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's home seeking to hold her hostage and attacked her husband.

Roger Corman, a prolific producer who also gave first breaks to future Hollywood luminaries has died. He was 98.

Palestinians flee Rafah as fighting continues; Artists in 4 cities create murals to celebrate moms

The Office of Chief Medical Examiner will determine the cause of death, police said.

"Now every time you open the door for delivery, you have to watch out."