Jelly Roll was ‘so nervous’ at the CMAs, the singer shattered his award

US citizens who are unjustly held captive by other nations -- like Wall Street Journal reporter Evan Gershkovich -- are hit with big bills from the IRS for unpaid taxes when they return home.

Virginia installs special viewfinders at each of its 43 state parks.

ABCIn the aftermath of the vice presidential debate between JD Vance and Tim Walz, Jimmy Kimmel turned his attention to Donald Trump’s online behavior throughout the night as the former president live-reacted to the debate on his Truth Social account.Kimmel, who has long joked that Vance was a bad VP pick and that Trump regrets choosing him, read Trump’s initial announcement that he would be live posting. “I will be doing a personal PLAY BY PLAY of the Debate tomorrow between the Brilliant J.D. Vance and the Highly Inarticulate ‘Tampon’ Tim Walz,” Trump wrote on Monday.“This post tells you all you need to know about how Trump looks at this. On the biggest night of JD Vance’s career, his running mate, he’s telling his followers, ‘Watch me on Truth Social, commenting on it.’”Read more at The Daily Beast.

What lies beneath the Great Lakes' waves is largely unknown, but there's a new push to learn more about thousands of shipwrecks, underwater infrastructure and the impacts of climate change on the bottom of the world's largest freshwater system

Voting starts in the annual Fat Bear Week contest at Alaska’s Katmai National Park and Preserve

Photo Illustration by Elizabeth Brockway/The Daily Beast/ReutersThe first and only vice presidential debate made two things clear: Democratic vice presidential nominee Tim Walz is a nice guy. But sometimes nice guys have to bring out the knives–and Walz failed to do that.Walz’s Republican vice presidential opponent, JD Vance, is dangerous man. He lies through his teeth. In the debate, he repeatedly obfuscated, dodged, and flat-out fabricated answers, refusing to acknowledge, for example, that he said he would have refused to certify the 2020 election, that he supported a national abortion ban, and that he knowingly spread a false story about Haitian immigrants eating people’s pets in an Ohio town. He wouldn’t even admit that Trump lost in 2020.Vance changes his stated positions with the political winds; he is a man who wants power so badly that he is willing to join the ticket of a candidate he once compared to Hitler. If Trump loses for a second time, Vance may simply refuse to admit it and may be very willing to take American democracy down with him.Read more at The Daily Beast.

I wonder whether Rempe would have more value to the Blueshirts down the stretch and in the playoffs if he were to start the season in Hartford.

As with the ABC presidential debate between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris, the CBS News moderators embarrassed themselves by clearly favoring the Democrat contestant.

Garcia Glenn White, 61, was the sixth inmate put to death in the U.S. in the last 11 days. His execution comes shortly after the U.S. Supreme Court rejected three last-ditch appeals.

CBS NewsJD Vance dodged the question put directly to him by Tim Walz Tuesday night: Did Donald Trump lose the 2020 presidential election? The self-declared hillbilly wouldn’t answer outright, but promised he’ll personally support Kamala Harris and Walz if they win on Nov. 5.“Of course, I hope that we win and I think we’re going to win, but if Tim Walz is the next vice president, he’ll have my prayers,” Vance said during pair’s high-stakes vice presidential debate. “He’ll have my best wishes and he’ll have my help whenever he wants it.”Read more at The Daily Beast.

There’s a defining takeaway for the Harris campaign to use.

JD Vance and Tim Walz shake hands during the first vice presidential debate at the CBS Broadcast Center in New York on October 1, 2024. | Al Drago/Bloomberg via Getty Images The vice presidential debate between Tim Walz and JD Vance on Tuesday was something of a stalemate, though it did feature several striking moments and offered an interesting preview into what presidential politics might look like once Donald Trump is off the stage. It isn’t clear yet how genuinely undecided voters responded to the debate — a CBS poll afterward showed 42 percent of debate watchers thought Vance won and 41 percent thought Walz did, while 17 percent thought it was a tie. A CNN poll showed 51 percent thought Vance won and 49 percent thought Walz did (CNN didn’t offer the “tie” option). Scored purely on affect and debating technique — without regard to factual accuracy — Vance did a bit better. He stuck to his two-pronged strategy: first, to blame Kamala Harris for everything voters don’t like that has happened under the Biden administration; and second, to put a reasonable-seeming face on Trumpism.  In doing so, though, Vance said many misleading or totally untrue things, such as that Donald Trump saved Obamacare, that immigrants caused the US housing crisis, and that Trump was merely peacefully discussing “problems” with the 2020 election rather than blatantly trying to steal that election from the rightful winner, Joe Biden. Walz’s performance was rockier, and while he had his moments — he spoke effectively about health care, abortion, and Trump’s threat to democracy — his answers were less disciplined and more scattershot. He seemed flatfooted by a question regarding his past, reportedly untrue claims to have been in Hong Kong at the time of the Tiananmen Square crackdown in 1989 – not exactly the most important and pressing issue of the day, but something he probably should have prepared a better answer for. So, on points, Vance may have won by a nose. But he did so in a way that is unlikely to matter very much, if at all, for the presidential contest. In general, vice presidential debates very rarely impact the polls. And this particular debate lacked any breakout moment likely to dominate headlines for days in what’s become a very crowded October news environment (Middle East escalation, Hurricane Helene, the port strike).  This debate almost certainly didn’t change the race — we may not even be talking about it for much longer — but there were some interesting moments that told us more about the candidates and the politics of 2024 as we head into the campaign’s final month. Winner: JD Vance’s code-switching abilities Say what you will about JD Vance, but the man knows how to code-switch. When he attended Yale Law School and when he promoted his book Hillbilly Elegy, he knew how to sound appealing to liberal elites. When he tried to cultivate the far right to win the Ohio Senate primary in 2022, he went all-out saying absurd and offensive things (in a way that has hurt him this year, when his remarks about “childless cat ladies” resurfaced). And on the debate stage Tuesday, he was laser-focused on sweet-talking swing voters.  Vance didn’t engage in bomb-throwing; he wasn’t an attack dog or an edgelord. He assured viewers that he felt their pain and that their pain was all Kamala Harris’s fault. (He solved the problem of how to hold Harris responsible for Biden’s record by simply rebranding the Biden-Harris administration as the “Kamala Harris administration,” pretending she was in charge of everything all along.) When abortion came up, Vance — who said in 2022 that he “certainly would like abortion to be illegal nationally” and said in 2023 that he wanted to prosecute people who sent abortion pills through the mail — took the unusual rhetorical tack of admitting the public didn’t trust the GOP on the issue and that he and his fellow Republicans needed to earn their trust.  For those worried about the whole “Trump tried for months to prevent the peaceful transfer of power to Joe Biden when he lost the election” thing? Well, let Vance set your mind at ease. Trump “peacefully gave over power on January 20th,” 2021, after all. Who cares what happened in the two months before that, anyway? The real threat to democracy, Vance claimed, was the “censorship” of Kamala Harris. That last pivot may have been a bit too smooth because when Walz asked Vance directly who won the 2020 election, Vance dodged again, claiming he was “focused on the future.” For anyone who remembers how Trump’s months-long campaign of lies helped cause the chaos of January 6, 2021, Vance’s answer will likely not be convincing. But this is a topic where he can only go so far to avoid angering the guy at the top of the ticket. —Andrew Prokop Loser: The narrative that Tim Walz is a media phenomenon When Kamala Harris suddenly became the Democratic presidential nominee and needed to perform an expedited running mate search, Walz stood out from the crowd of Democratic hopefuls by doing some compelling media appearances, including the one where he memorably dubbed Republicans as “just weird.”  This seemed to contrast with both Biden’s and Harris’s tendencies to be extremely cautious about doing unscripted press, and made some Democrats overjoyed that they had found a politician who was out there putting forward a message in the media. In retrospect, those strong Walz interviews were all with friendly interlocutors, not in the oppositional, high-stakes setting of a debate. Indeed, when the Harris camp vetted Walz for VP, he admitted that he was a “bad debater,” CNN reported in August. On Tuesday morning, Politico reported that Democrats were privately worried about how Walz would fare in the debate. And once the debate kicked off, some commentators watching it wondered where the Tim Walz who was good on TV had gone.  Walz’s performance was not disastrous. Far from it. He seems to have come off just fine to viewers, per CBS’s post-debate poll, and he had several good moments. For instance, it was smart of him to ask Vance directly whether Biden won the 2020 election, and to call Vance’s dodge a “damning non-answer.” It was not exactly a masterful showing, though. Walz seemed uncomfortable in the format compared to the smooth-talking Vance, he didn’t really seem to have one overarching message that he kept returning to, and he often missed opportunities to call out Vance’s lies and misrepresentations.  Walz’s answer on his own misrepresentation of his 1989 visit to Hong Kong — in which he talked about his Nebraska childhood for a while before concluding he “misspoke” — was genuinely bad. Fortunately for him, of all the issues that came up on the debate stage, that’s the one of least relevance to substantive issues affecting Americans today, and the least likely to affect voters’ decisions about whether to cast their ballots for Harris. —AP Winner: Obamacare One of Vance’s more remarkable lies of the night was this: Donald Trump saved Obamacare.  He said the law “was crushing under the weight of its own regulatory burden in health care costs” before the former president took office in 2017 and started loosening some of its rules. “I think he can make a good argument that it salvaged Obamacare, which was doing disastrously until Donald Trump came along,” the Republican vice presidential candidate said. Donald Trump supported the Republican Congress’s effort to roll back most of Obamacare, including undoing some of the regulations for preexisting conditions and making major cuts to Medicaid. It failed because of John McCain. Trump dramatically cut funding for enrollment outreach. He tried to introduce Medicaid work requirements for people covered by the ACA’s expansion (but was stopped by the courts). He deregulated short-term insurance plans that left people vulnerable to thousands of dollars in bills if they had a serious medical emergency. In 2016, when Donald Trump was elected, the ACA marketplaces covered 12.7 million people. In 2020, when he lost the election to Joe Biden, they covered 11.4 million. After four years of Biden, 21.4 million Americans are getting their insurance through HealthCare.gov or one of its state counterparts. Voters have come to trust Democrats on health care much more over the years since the law Republicans tagged as “Obamacare” passed. More than 60 percent of Americans now say they like the ACA.  In 2010, Obamacare was the culprit for the Democratic wipeout in Congress, but its political fortunes have turned dramatically. In 2018, Democrats won the House, largely by running on a message that without a Democratic check, Trump’s myriad efforts to topple the law would succeed. Ever since, it has been a political asset for them against Republicans — forcing Vance to simply pretend that Trump’s health care record is different from what it is. —Dylan Scott Loser: The moderators From the start, Norah O’Donnell and Margaret Brennan, the CBS news moderators, made it clear they did not think it was their job to keep the candidates grounded in reality.  “The primary role of the moderators is to facilitate the debate between the candidates, enforce the rules, and provide the candidates with the opportunity to fact-check claims made by each other,” Brennan told viewers. And for the most part, the moderators allowed the candidates’ answers to go unchecked.  The questions themselves were either not probing enough or poorly framed. When Brennan turned to Vice President Kamala Harris’s campaign promise to build 3 million homes, for example, she confoundingly asked Walz where those homes would get built, not how.  And despite Trump’s continued election denial and Vance’s previous statements that he would not have certified the 2020 election results, the moderators left questions about the fate of American democracy till the very end. One of the debate’s most memorable moments was when Vance wouldn’t answer Walz’s question about whether Trump lost in 2020.  Viewers don’t have to look too far back to see how it is, in fact, possible to have good debate moderators. ABC News’ David Muir and Linsey Davis did a much better job moderating last month’s presidential debate. They fact-checked the candidates in real time — making it hard for even Trump to get away with lying — and pressed both Harris and Trump with tough questions. They also tried to avoid letting the candidates dodge questions entirely.  Luckily for O’Donnell and Brennan, they’re not going to stand out; they’re not the only debate moderators who have stumbled in the Trump era. The voters, on the other hand, are the unlucky ones.  —Abdallah Fayyad Winner: A surprising amount of decency After nine years of increasingly toxic political discourse and six weeks of mud-slinging between the two No. 2s on the trail, it was reasonable to expect a nasty affair when Trump and Harris’s attack dogs were unleashed on one another on the debate stage. So it was a little shocking that Walz and Vance not only refrained from hurling personal attacks at one another, but even found common ground at many points. Midwest Nice prevailed: kind on the surface, followed by the occasional sting. While Vance was criticizing Harris’s approach to the southern border, he seemed apologetic: “Tim, I agree with you,” Vance said. “I think you want to solve this problem, but I don’t think Kamala Harris does.” Later on, the two would find comity over the effects of off-shoring and trade deficits. “Much of what the senator said, I am in agreement with him on,” Walz said. And after Walz mentioned his son had witnessed a shooting, Vance reacted sympathetically: “I didn’t know that your 17-year-old witnessed a shooting and I’m sorry about that. I want to say — Christ have mercy. It is awful.” This seems to be the way the debate will be remembered, if at all. It made both candidates seem more normal, civil, and human than they had seemed before — a particular advantage for Vance, who came in needing to soften his image. It may have been strategic politeness, but it was notable in an era when so much politeness has been dispensed with. In snap polls of debate watchers, both Walz and Vance saw increases in their favorability ratings. Focus group respondents seem to be saying similar things. “I hadn’t seen a debate like this in a very long time,” one undecided Michigan voter told CNN’s Phil Mattingly. “They supported each other. They were kind. And it was warm and fuzzy — you could watch it without being offended.” —Christian Paz

They didn’t lower expectations far enough.

Chip Somodevilla/Getty ImagesListen to this full episode of The New Abnormal on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Amazon and Stitcher.Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz failed to meet the moment at Tuesday’s vice presidential debate in New York City in one big way, according to Danielle Moodie and Andy Levy, co-hosts of The New Abnormal. He was too nice.“I needed to see teeth during this and by teeth I mean like… take a bite out of JD Vance,” Moodie said. “JD Vance stood up there and Walz normalized his lies.”Read more at The Daily Beast.

CBSRepublican vice presidential wannabe and Ohio Sen. JD Vance edged out his Democratic opponent Tim Walz by just 1 percent in the vice presidential debate in what is being widely viewed as a tie between between the pair.The first flash poll, conducted by CBS News and YouGov, was released shortly after the debate aired on Tuesday night, with voters rendering a decision of 42 percent to Vance, 41 percent to Walz and a further 17 percent who claimed it was a tie.The results are in stark contrast to both presidential debates this year, when Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump argued Biden out of the race in June, and a subsequently strong showing from Kamala Harris–despite Trump continuing to claim he won. According to CBS, 88 percent of voters believed the debate itself was “generally positive.”Read more at The Daily Beast.

It turns out no one wants to hear these guys debate policy at all.

If first appearances are everything, Democratic vice presidential candidate Tim Walz lost the debate before his Republican counterpart had a chance to speak.

JD Vance sailed fairly smoothly through some 90 minutes of Tuesday’s debate with Tim Walz. Then the subject turned to the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol.

Donald Trump Jr. told CNN the media is partly responsible for a pair of assassination attempts against former President Trump by pushing false narratives that radicalize critics.

Multiple news reports indicate that Democratic vice presidential nominee Tim Walz misleadingly claimed he was in Hong Kong during the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre, part of a broader pattern of inaccuracies that Republicans hope to exploit.

Vice President Kamala Harris hasn’t held a formal press conference with reporters since she became the presumptive and now official Democratic nominee.

CBS NewsThere is no question that the big loser at Tuesday night’s CBS vice presidential debate was the audience.It is not just that the debate was boring, although it was often stultifying. It’s that the debate itself obscured more about the core issues in campaign 2024 than it revealed.After watching this debate for almost two hours, a viewer would never have known that Donald Trump was a convicted felon, that he was judged liable for rape, or that he has been charged with stealing national secrets. You would not have a clue that he has said he would suspend the Constitution on his first day in office, that he and his running mate J.D. Vance were, in fact, racists and misogynists, that Trump’s signature policy proposal, a round-up of 10-20 million “migrants,” would likely tear the country apart and lead to the creation of concentration camps. You wouldn’t know that Trump has said he would throw his rivals in prison.Read more at The Daily Beast.

A focus group reacted to JD Vance's microphone being cut off during the CBS debate, with many Republicans and independents disapproving of the moderators' interruption.

Carlos Barria/ReutersJill Twiss, a former senior writer on HBO’s Last Week Tonight with John Oliver, took over The Daily Beast’s X feed on Tuesday night to live-tweet the vice presidential debate between Tim Walz and JD Vance. If you watched the debate from behind the sofa (or wisely tuned in to the Fat Bear Week bracket reveal) relive the night through her unique take. Read more at The Daily Beast.

Mark Chavez, who is expected to plead guilty to conspiring to distribute the surgical anesthetic ketamine, would be the third person to plead guilty in the aftermath of the 'Friends' star’s fatal overdose last year.

Sen. JD Vance at the vice presidential debate on October 1, 2024. | Michele Crowe/CBS via Getty Images At the end of the vice presidential debate, Gov. Tim Walz asked Sen. JD Vance a pointed question: Did Donald Trump lose the 2020 election? Vance’s response: “Tim, I’m focused on the future. Did Kamala Harris censor Americans from speaking their mind in the wake of the 2020 Covid situation?” There is a clear right answer — that the 2020 presidential election was in fact legitimate — and Vance refused to offer it. It was, as Walz immediately noted, “A damning non-answer,” one that showed viewers who JD Vance is and what he stands for.  Ultimately, every issue discussed earlier that night comes in second to the fundamental question of whether America’s democratic institutions deserve to endure. On that question, Vance truly is radical, and his exposure as such was the only truly important moment of the night. Many Republicans have embraced Trump’s lies about the last election. Some have done so reluctantly, but Vance has been enthusiastic. He has, among other things, fundraised for January 6 rioters and said he would have illegally thrown the 2020 election result to Congress had he been in Mike Pence’s position at the time. But what’s most distinctive about Vance is the degree to which he has paired 2020 conspiracy theories with a coterie of other anti-democratic positions and ideologies. In a 2021 podcast interview, Vance said that Trump should “fire every single mid-level bureaucrat” in the US government and “replace them with our people.” If the Supreme Court intervened, Vance suggested that Trump simply ignore the ruling and dare the Court to stop him. In the interview, he explicitly cited Curtis Yarvin — a Silicon Valley blogger who advocates for overthrowing democracy and replacing it with a form of monarchy — as an influence on his views in this area. None of this should come as a surprise. Anti-democratic radicalism has been central to Vance’s political identity since he began running for Senate in Ohio, widely discussed since he was tapped to be Trump’s vice president earlier this year. And yet, it wasn’t central to the vice presidential debate tonight. The moderators left it until the very last minutes of the event, only coming up after the debate was originally scheduled to end. Despite democracy being at the core of the difference between the two candidates onstage — in fact, the core ideological difference between the two parties today — it was treated as an afterthought.  In doing so, the moderators created an illusion of normalcy: allowing the two candidates to civilly discuss issues like housing and the deficit in a basically standard-politician manner, when in fact they disagree on an existential question about the nature of American government itself.  It’s also worth dwelling on Vance’s attempt at deflection — the confusing line about Harris trying to “censor Americans from speaking their mind” on the Covid-19 pandemic — because I think it’s essential to understanding the ideological scaffolding of anti-democratic politics on the right today. There are multiple theories on the right about how the Biden administration colluded with Big Tech to censor Americans, and it wasn’t exactly clear which particular one Vance was referencing. For present purposes, the details of the issue are less important than the ideological role they play. For Vance and others like him, it is essential to do more than just insist that Trump was right in 2020 — to go the extra mile and say that Democrats are the true threat to democracy in America today. That argument, the claim that he and Trump are democracy’s real defenders, serves as justification for taking aggressive action to seize power. When Vance proposed to “fire every single mid-level bureaucrat” in 2021, he didn’t sell it as a naked power grab. Rather, he positioned it as a kind of counter-offensive: a necessary response to the left’s alleged stranglehold over the “deep state” in Washington. The rallying cry of Trump’s campaign to overthrow the 2020 election wasn’t that democracy was illegitimate, but rather that Trump had been robbed of his authentic victory by Democratic cheating. Stop the steal! The argument that “Democrats are worse” does more than just legitimize power grabs. It also is a powerful disciplining tool for wavering Republicans, the kind that aren’t on board with Trump or Vance’s rough-and-tumble politics. If they waver or blanch, the response that Democrats are more dangerous helps bring them back onside — producing the phenomenon known as anti-anti-Trumpism. In just one moment, in short, the veneer of normalcy carefully built up over the past 90 minutes was punctured. Vance not only exposed the true center of his candidacy, but also some of the key ideological scaffolding underpinning the Republican Party’s turn into anti-democratic territory. What makes Tucker tick? One question I get asked about JD Vance is “does he really believe the things he says?” It’s an intriguing question, but in some ways an irrelevant one: What matters about a politician is less what they “truly believe” in their secret hearts than what they say in public. The same goes for one of the men reportedly instrumental in Vance’s elevation: Tucker Carlson. A longtime Washington journalist turned ludicrous Trump-aligned demagogue, discussing “what happened to Tucker” is one of the capital city’s most popular guessing games — if an ultimately pointless and unanswerable one. Yet journalist John McCormack’s recent piece on the subject — titled “What Happened to Tucker Carlson?” — is nonetheless worth your time. While ultimately concluding that its titular question is impossible to answer, McCormack manages to shed a great deal of light on who Tucker is and the thoroughgoing nature of his political transformation. It’s very much worth reading. A few other links: A conservative activist loses his job over gay porn. Studying philosophy is good for you. A parable about the dockworkers’ strike. The very simple case against Trump’s very simple tariff.

"These are the two most boring men in the world," one campaign veteran said.

The armed civilian who helped take out two terrorists that killed at least seven people in Tel Aviv on Tuesday has been identified as a survivor of the Nova Music Festival in southern Israel on Oct. 7, according to reports.

Ohio Sen. JD Vance received a mixed reaction from voters as he discussed the border crisis and potential deporations during his debate with Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz.

The two vice presidential candidates struck a cordial tone as they spoke in-depth about everything from immigration to health care and democracy.

Jose Butto was overpowering for two perfect innings.

One of Democrats’ greatest advantages in this election cycle is Vance’s brutal and historic unpopularity in the eyes of American voters.

Fox News Digital's dial group made up of independent, Democratic and Republican voters differed on Democratic Gov. Tim Walz's comments on abortion in Minnesota.

Makena Cook threw three touchdown passes to keep the Orange Lutheran flag football team unbeaten with a 20-13 victory.

On Tuesday, after the vice-presidential debate had concluded, ABC News' Linsey Davis, one of the moderators of last month's presidential debate, said Democratic vice-presidential nominee Gov. Tim Walz's (D-MN) performance left much to be desired. The post ABC’s Linsey Davis Likens Walz Debate Performance to Biden June Debate Effort appeared first on Breitbart.

tk

They were the last two criminal defendants to be sentenced in a case that prompted Pennsylvania lawmakers to crack down on hazing.

A CBS News poll and a CNN poll following the vice presidential debate on Tuesday night showed that JD Vance beat Tim Walz by varying margins.  The post CBS, CNN Polls Say JD Vance Beat Tim Walz in Debate appeared first on Breitbart.

He’s good at slippery statements. But this one was wild.

Fox NewsFox News’ Jesse Watters didn’t even bother focusing on JD Vance’s rhetorical performance during Tuesday’s vice-presidential debate against Tim Walz, instead narrowing his focus on a sole topic: his looks.“He looked beautiful tonight,” Watters told a Fox News’ panel after the debate ended. “He looked humble. He looked earnest, sharp—20 years younger than Walz.”Watters’ comments were part of a flood of praise from Fox personalities over Vance’s performance on Tuesday, which has garnered praise over his composure compared to some of Walz’s verbal gaffes on befriending school shooters and acknowledging he was a “knucklehead” for his comments on being in Hong Kong during the Tiananmen Square massacre. Read more at The Daily Beast.

Read the full transcript of the vice presidential debate hosted by CBS News between Sen. JD Vance and Gov. Tim Walz.

NetflixAppearances are dangerously deceiving in It’s What’s Inside, a horror comedy in which youthful insecurities, desires, and resentments lead to dizzying disaster. Premiering on Netflix on Oct. 4 following its acclaimed bow at the Sundance Film Festival, writer/director Greg Jardin’s feature debut cares far less about scares than thrills, and it generates plenty of giddy ones as it mires its characters in a predicament of head-spinning proportions.Aimed at a twentysomething crowd in both style and substance, and best seen with as little prior knowledge as possible, it’s an inventively loopy ride that gets entertaining mileage out of the fantasy of walking in someone else’s shoes—at least, for a brief time.Moving at the same pace that its heroine scrolls through her social media accounts—which is depicted on-screen via rapid-fire split-screen cuts—It’s What’s Inside feels like it’s hopped up on too many Red Bulls, and that hyperactivity is central to its flip-flopping story.Read more at The Daily Beast.

CBS News poll finds Walz and Vance improved their standing in what debate watchers said was a positive debate.

For more than 90 minutes, J. D. Vance delivered an impressive performance in the vice-presidential debate. Calm, articulate, and detailed, the Republican parried tricky questions about Donald Trump and put a reasonable face on policies that voters have rejected elsewhere. Vance’s offers were frequently dishonest, but they were smooth.And then things went off the rails.In the final question of the debate, moderators asked the Ohio senator about threats to democracy, and in particular his statement that as vice president he would not have certified the 2020 election. In his response, Vance tried to rewrite the history of the January 6, 2021, riot and Donald Trump’s attempt to steal the election, revealing why he would be a dangerous vice president.Vance claimed that Trump “peacefully gave over power on January 20” and said, “I believe we do have a threat to democracy in this country, but it’s not the threat that Kamala Harris and Tim Walz want to talk about. It’s the threat of censorship.” This strange misdirection requires Americans to disbelieve what they saw and what Trump said in favor of an extremely online conservative talking point.[David A. Graham: Don’t let them pretend this didn’t happen]Walz, the Minnesota governor and Democratic nominee, sniffed blood and asked Vance point-blank whether he believed Trump had lost the 2020 election. Vance refused to answer, and instead rambled again about censorship. “You guys wanted to kick people off Facebook,” he said, as though that allegation was worse than stealing an election.A vice-presidential debate is important not because it is likely to shift the polls—it isn’t—but because it tells voters something about the policies of the two people who could become president. Although both candidates dodged the moderators’ direct questions, voters may well have gained a more complete understanding of the two parties’ platforms on climate change, the economy, and immigration, and how widely they diverge. Both candidates were civil, even polite. But Vance’s answer on fundamental issues of democracy—or rather, his refusal to commit to it—suggested that such a basic question should have arisen far earlier in the night.[David Frum: How Harris roped a dope]For most of the 90 minutes, Walz was clearly struggling. Ahead of the debate, both sides tried to set expectations, with Democrats warning that Walz was historically a shaky debater and the Trump campaign insisting he was great at it. The Democrats were closer to the mark. Walz came out seeming nervous, and though he calmed down, he never looked comfortable. He frequently sounded like he was spinning his wheels, with none of the casual conversationalism that has been his trademark in his brief time in the national spotlight. He was somber and effortful.The Minnesota governor’s worst moment came when he was asked why he’d said he was in China during the Tiananmen Square massacre, when in fact he’d arrived later that summer. Vance gave a circuitous answer about his personal biography, copping to occasionally being a “knucklehead.” Only when pressed in a follow-up did he finally just admit he’d misspoken, falling short of the image of the plainspoken plainsman he’s cultivated so carefully. Walz’s best moments came when he was most personal, such as when he talked about Minnesota farmers experiencing the effects of climate change or how meeting the families of children killed in the Sandy Hook shooting shaped his views on gun control.[Mark Leibovich: Tim Walz is too good at this]The best evidence of Walz’s poor performance was the fact that Vance, who has been a gaffe machine and can seem wooden and impersonal—“weird,” in Walz’s parlance—came across well by comparison. He seemed relatively smooth and competent even though he tried to change the subject or twist the context when asked to defend Trump’s past actions. For example, rather than defend Trump’s family-separation policy at the border, Vance said that “the real family-separation policy in our country is unfortunately Kamala Harris’s open southern border.” (You would never have known from Vance’s answers that Harris is vice president or that Joe Biden even exists.) Pressed on Trump’s bogus claim that climate change is a “hoax,” Vance gave a misleading answer about Harris’s energy policy. When moderators clarified details about legal immigrants in Springfield, Ohio, Vance complained that debate rules banned fact-checking.On subjects such as abortion, where Vance’s past statements have been controversial, he was able to appear thoughtful and reasonable. Explaining why he had supported a national ban on abortion in the past but no longer did, he cited the results of a 2023 referendum in Ohio that supported abortion rights. “What I learned from that, Nora, is that we’ve got to do a better job at winning back people’s trust,” Vance said. Notably, this isn’t the same as taking a clear position on abortion. Trump has waffled on his position, but has boasted about overturning Roe v. Wade.[Read: The next Republican leader]This kind of spin, however misleading, is a bit of a throwback to politics the way they used to be practiced. For much of the night, the debate was strikingly boring, in the best way—unlike the NASCAR vibe that we’ve become accustomed to since 2016, where viewers are watching to see if there’s a fiery crash. Vance’s final, appalling answer about January 6, though, was a reminder that Trump is a destructive force, which his running-mate, of all people, can’t hope to escape.

Anna Moneymaker/Getty ImagesGeorge Santos set the record straight about viral allegations that JD Vance wears eyeliner, claiming the Ohio senator’s smokey-eye is all natural.“Vance does NOT use eye liner,” the disgraced former congressman-turned-internet personality posted to X on Tuesday night during the vice presidential debate. According to Santos, Donald Trump’s running mate has long eyelashes that “cast a shadow on his waterline” while under studio lights. “Grow up people!” he added.Read more at The Daily Beast.

Tanto el demócrata Walz, gobernador de Minnesota, como el republicano Vance, senador por Ohio, centraron muchas de sus líneas de ataque, en buena parte cordiales,

Democratic VP hopeful Tim Walz called his response a "damning non answer."

Attorneys allege Emanuel “Manny” Garcia was a 15-year-old freshman on March 9, 2021, when he was injured after slipping on uneven terrain. They claim Newport-Mesa Unified School District knew about dangerous field conditions but failed to act.